As demonstrated by this symposium, the opinion in wood v.

Otis f wood v lucy. Wood possesses a business organization adapted to the placing of such. We are told at the outset by way of recital that the said otis f. Court of appeals of new york argued november 14, 1917 decided december 4, 1917.

While lucy was a famous public figure, otis [wood] was not exactly chopped liver. victor goldberg, reading. Appeal from supreme court, appellate division, first department. Cardozo established precedent in the realm of contract.

We are told at the outset by way of. 214 (1917), court of appeals of new york, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Ness as a fashion designer, but in victor goldberg's sprightly prose:

Stevens & bro., ill app. She employed wood to help her do her business, and gave him exclusive right to license out her name in exchange for 50% of the profits he earned. We are told at the outset by way of recital that:

Wood v lucy lady duff gordon from mfc 332 at suny buffalo state college. Many other terms of the agreement point the same way. Name instructor course date case briefs otis f.

Court of appeals of new york argued november 14, 1917 decided december 4, 1917 222 ny 88 cite title as: The essential facts are these. Court of appeals of the state of new york.