1004 is a Tort Law case concerning negligence and duty of care.

Dorset v yacht home office. VTHE DORSET YACHT COMPANY LIMITED. It did not matter if the act of the third party was tortious or not. 1969 2 QB 412 1969 2 WLR 1008 1969 2 All ER 564 Cited Donoghue or MAlister v Stevenson HL 26-May-1932 Decomposed Snail in Drink Liability The appellant drank from.

One night the Borstal officers retired for the evening leaving the boys unsupervised. During their escape they crashed into the claimants boat. 1970 2 WLR 1140.

A duty of care can arise for intentional acts by a third party within the control of the defendant Lord Pearsons judgment Facts. The defendants had failed to prevent the escape an omission. Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co 1970 AC 1004 Case summary last updated at 18012020 1839 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

NEGLIGENCE DUTY OF CARE BOSTRAL OFFICERS DUTY OF CARE TO WHOM PUBLIC POLICY IMMUNITY FROM ACTION. Judgement for the case Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co. Home Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co 1970 AC 1004.

1970 2 All ER 294. It was found the Home Office owed a duty of care as. Borstal officers were required to supervise young offenders who were working on Brown Sea Island however the officers left the boys unsupervised.

1970 1 Lloyds Rep. Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd 1970 AC 1004. The owner sued the home office.