The audio conference is better for shorter meetings.

Audio and video conferencing differences. Cameras are used to enable participants in a virtual conference to see the presenter and sometimes the other participants. As the name suggests audio conferencing is a conference in which participants are only able to hear each others voice. As bandwidth and processing power have increased over the decades these platforms added audio and video as a response to market pressure and customer requests.

Audio conferencing systems are much cheaper than video conferencing systems. Video conferencing involves a large amount of data thats transferred across a network at a rapid pace. Participants to the conference can see and hear each other according to rules defined by a video conference mode.

The cost of solutions. Audio conferencing on the other hand can take place without the need for a face-to-face setup. Video Conferencing uses video and audio to connect two or more points across the internet for two-way conferencing over distance.

This allows the participants to see each other while communicating. On the other hand video conferencing has both audio and video. Most video conferencing equipment transmits audio and video over a network using RTP which multiplexes audio and video into separate network streams.

Users can also exchange various media assets content. On the tech side video conferencing demands high-speed internet higher streaming bandwidth good quality audiovisual gear and so on. However newer systems such as Camfrog enable multi-user video conferencing.

They cannot see other users or show presentations and use other collaboration tools that imply eye contact. This method is in contrast to the format for DVDs which multiplex the audio and video streams into a single stream called an MPEG2 program stream. Even simple audio over IP was a lot to ask for in those days.