About the boats themselves the Alumacraft was heavier and required a larger and heavier motor but the weight appeared to be invested in a true double-bottom hull versus only a forward section double hull on the.

Alumacraft vs lund quality. Both are top quality however Alumacraft does not have the marketing machine or the sponsorship that Lund has therefore more Lunds out there and a higher price. The Alumacraft would have been a little less money but the dealer wanted to put it on a trailer I didnt care for. The customer service you get with a Lund boat is no joke.

Im looking for a boat anddtrailer only as my Yamaha 60 is only 8 years old and runs great. Our pros call it the Alumacraft Ride. His Lund pro might cut through bigger waves a.

Why would this be. Lund I did mention some models but I wanted to know the overall satisfaction of both Alumacraft and Lund owners. Compare a Alumacraft Tournament Pro to a Lund Pro V and you get a lot more for the money.

Not an Etec vs. X2 I had a similar Lund as you have now upgraded to same size but finished out Alumacraft and ride is worse. Great on gas very wide and stable for casting spot lock lots of storage.

My brother in laws Lund is very comparable but he put 115 hp Yamaha and I think he should have got a 150. Also very nice. I had them price aLund Pro Guide 165 tiller vs.

Specs on each were similar. By reputation Lund is at the top of the aluminum boat manufactures for quality resale value historically. If you are truly down to Lund vs.